NCAA2
Regular Season Round 29: Lynchburg - Salem 53-98
Date: December 3, 2022
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
Regular Season Round 29: Lynchburg - Salem 53-98
Date: December 3, 2022
 LYNCHBURG HORNETS (coach: Hilary Scott)53 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 6 | Wallas, biQZus | 35 | 0-68 (36.9%) | 8-9 (82.1%) | 4-4 (655%) | 6 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 67 | 66 | 5 |
| 0 | gujjiZV, ciZh | 47 | 6-7 (66.6%) | 5-4 (5%) | 8-1 (44.4%) | 8 | 2 | 65 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 3 | -0 | 5 |
| 4 | GIIdR, ChQasUaij | 42 | 1-68 (05%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-0 (15%) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 60 | 65 | 5 |
| 88 | yQiJaRQ, biQV | 84 | 6-4 (44.4%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| 8 | mliZVBIj, CiB | 84 | 5-0 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-8 (5%) | 5 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | -65 | 5 |
| 86 | CIIV, gIjjaR | 84 | 8-8 (655%) | 8-3 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 6 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 66 | 9 | 5 |
| 60 | mQFijU, zIshui | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | -6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 60-34 (43.7%) | 3-85 (85.5%) | 66-67 (09.7%) | 1 | 84 | 87 | 6 | 65 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 68 | 04 | 61 | |||
 SALEM TIGERS (coach: Vincent Thibodeau)98 |
| FIELD GOALS | REBOUNDS | FOULS | BLOCKS | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | NAME | MIN | 2PM-A | 3PM-A | FTM-A | OFF | DEF | RB | AS | F | RV | ST | FV | AG | TO | PT | RNK | +/- |
| 60 | ABaUh, AUij | 45 | 0-65 (05%) | 1-9 (20.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 82 | 83 | 5 |
| 86 | HRiUhRQajDUIj, ealRF | 83 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 2 | 5 |
| 88 | PVuFaDi, yIpR | 84 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 5-8 (5%) | 4-3 (90%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 5 |
| 84 | wRjR, zusUaj | 62 | 8-4 (11.9%) | 6-6 (655%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 7 | 66 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 68 | 5 |
| 6 | ABaUh, eIdjRF | 62 | 6-8 (05%) | 5-6 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 8 | miQlRF, KipIjR | 46 | 3-9 (09.6%) | 4-1 (05%) | 6-6 (655%) | 3 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 62 | 88 | 5 |
| 0 | HiQdF, oij | 84 | 4-2 (49.0%) | 8-4 (11.9%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 68 | 64 | 5 |
| 48 | wZhidIuTi, SshQif | 68 | 4-3 (90%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 4 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 66 | 5 |
| 65 | bIQRlijd, WilVRQ | 2 | 6-6 (655%) | 6-0 (85%) | 8-8 (655%) | 8 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 5 |
| 64 | SUsuQRj, SUi | 9 | 8-0 (35%) | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 8 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| 44 | ChuVTudIJaR, OQiasR | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-6 (5%) | 8-8 (655%) | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| 80 | Kishili, KRLaj | 4 | 5-5 (5%) | 5-5 (5%) | 6-8 (05%) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| wIUil | 80-05 (05.5%) | 64-89 (32.8%) | 7-66 (26.2%) | 69 | 49 | 03 | 69 | 60 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 65 | 72 | 660 | |||
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| #1 MARCUS WILLIS |
COMPARE PLAYERS | #15 STAN SMITH
|
Terms:
Field Goals : 2PM-A (2 point Field Goal made-attempts) 3PM-A (3 point Field Goal made-attempts) FTM-A (free throws made-attempt)
Rebounds : OFF (Offensive) DEF (Defensive) TOT (total)
Fouls : CM (Committed) RV (received)
Blocks : FV (In Favor) AG (Against)
Other terms : MIN (minutes) AST (assists) ST (steals) TO (Turnovers) PTS (points) RNK (ranking)
